Kevin Gowen wrote:

> necoandjeff wrote:
>
>> "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:2p4i0dFgnl9cU5@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>>> necoandjeff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:2p4e6cFgnl9cU2@uni-berlin.de...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Like, say, the McMartin case?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In any case, but of course I am referring to cases in which the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> claimant was the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> victim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, you're not interested rights of the victim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the case of false accusation, the only situation you seem to care
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> about, yes, the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> No, but it IS *a* situation the founding fathers cared very much
>>>>>> about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, which specific parts of the Constitution do you object to?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The 16th.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The 2nd.
>>>
>>>
>>> That's the amendment that ensures that you have all the others.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you buy that nonsense, I've got some land in Florida I'd like to sell
>> you...
>
>
> I already own land in Florida.

Are you familiar with a fellow named Carl Hiassen?

Dan