Raj Feridun wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:52:58 +0000 (UTC), mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net
> wrote:
>
> >Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> >> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >
> >>> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> >>> > Raj Feridun wrote:
> >
> >>> > So do you believe the decision of a judge who is not involved in the matter,
> >>> > or a randomly selected bunch of amateurs, likewise not involved in the
> >>> > matter, and probably selected specifically because they know little or
> >>> > nothing of the case or scientific issues involved for the prosecution or
> >>>
> >>> So, you are opposed to the US Constitution?
> >
> >> The parts and usages that protect criminals.
> >
> >Uh, they protect the accused.

It should protect people who did nothing wrong, like victims, for example.

> I think what Eric's saying is he promotes a system of guilty until
> proven innocent.

Since you have not been here for the past six years, I promote a system of guilty
because the people did it (even no crime is discovered or reported), or innocent,
because they in fact, did nothing. A man in black or twelve amateurs who were not
there don't tell a rape victim that it didn't happen.