Raj Feridun wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 19:33:46 -0400, Kevin Gowen
> <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Raj Feridun wrote:
> 
> 
>>>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:33:12 -0400, Kevin Gowen
>>><kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>>>I think that opposition to Clinton was based much more on disgust than
>>>>>>on hate.
> 
>  
> 
>>>>>Do you know what people were disgusted about? An answer other than "yes"
>>>>>would be appreciated.
> 
> 
>>>>Immorality, 
> 
>  
> 
>>>Clinton got caught in his dalliances. That's what separates him from
>>>his Republican attack dogs. 
> 
> 
>>Ooh! Republican attack dogs! What do Democrats have, I wonder? We all 
>>know they never engage in opposition research and negative campaigning, 
>>after all.
> 
> 
> We were talking about Clinton's case, right? 

You were.

>>>When was he convicted of rape?! Damn, I missed a lot of big stories
>>>while I was over here.
> 
> 
>>You may not know this, but absense of a rape conviction does not mean 
>>absense of a rape.
> 
> 
> Far be it from me to argue the facts with you, counselor but I thought
> there was a judicial process for that sort of thing. 

The judicial process is only to determine guilt so the state can deprive 
a person of life, liberty, or property.

"Help! I've been robbed!"
"Shut up, mister! You haven't been robbed until there has been due 
process and an verdict of guilt!"

- Kevin