Kevin Gowen wrote:

> > We were talking about Clinton's case, right?
>
> You were.
>
> >>>When was he convicted of rape?! Damn, I missed a lot of big stories
> >>>while I was over here.
> >
> >
> >>You may not know this, but absense of a rape conviction does not mean
> >>absense of a rape.
> >
> >
> > Far be it from me to argue the facts with you, counselor but I thought
> > there was a judicial process for that sort of thing.
>
> The judicial process is only to determine guilt so the state can deprive
> a person of life, liberty, or property.
>
> "Help! I've been robbed!"
> "Shut up, mister! You haven't been robbed until there has been due
> process and an verdict of guilt!"
>
> - Kevin

Finally. Someone else on the group who is willing to stand up for this truth. A
certain someone claimed they would even await the outcome of a trial! before
making up his mind whether or not to believe his own wife's accusation of being
raped.