Raj Feridun wrote:

> If Clinton raped someone let them come forward and press charges.

There are valid reasons why people who are assaulted may not come forward,
publicly or otherwise. Untruth is only one, and a minor one at that.

> Then a jury can decide based on the evidence and testimony. Failing that
> you really need to just shut up with the unfounded aspersions.

So do you believe the decision of a judge who is not involved in the matter,
or a randomly selected bunch of amateurs, likewise not involved in the
matter, and probably selected specifically because they know little or
nothing of the case or scientific issues involved for the prosecution or
defense to arrive at their conclusions, has any bearing on what did or did
not actually happen to result in the filing of a complaint?