Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<40C1BE67.8E86D207@mchsi.com>...
> John Sefton wrote:
> > 
> > http://www.petcom.com/~john/
> > Galaxy model for atom
> 
> Crank Information
>   http://www.google.com/search?q=%22GALAXY+MODEL+For+The+ATOM%22+site%3Awww.crank.net

Strange, what concern has my paper? I estimate your informativeness
and often say it, but in this case I don't understand your reaction.
Even if John were wrong in his study (I still did not read but will,
so I mean the worst possible case), this gives a right to no one to
represent his work as crankwork. I believe, if you think better,  you
will agree with it.

Regards,

Sergey