Ernest Schaal wrote:

> You think he is exaggerating to some extent? I agree with you.

Exaggerating what?

> He exaggerates a lot, so much so that the hyperbole gets in the way. The
> language he uses about white, American, Christians seems to so a tad of
> excessive and a tad racist.

Why? Is it not true? I hear between four and ten million Indians are dead due to
the settlement of whites, and Hawaii lost about 90% of their native population
after settlers arrived. They also lost almost 100% of the land they lived on.

Are you sorry about the actions of your forefathers or for the benefits you
derived from them? Will you apologize to Indians or native Hawaiians the way you
want Japanese to do to former enemies and victims? Should Americans today
compensate blacks descended from slaves, Indians, or ethnic Hawaiians? What
should the US do today about Iraqis killed by accident or due to mistaken
judgment? What of even just the dead of Abu Ghraib?

> On the other hand, I have seen messages where he
> hates the acts of the local Japanese.
>
> As for the "double standard," that appears to be based upon his theory of
> morality, that all sins are equal. I got into a discussion with him a while
> back on morality and his views were to a rigid morality standard enforced on
> everybody that showed no distinction for culpability. To him,apparently a
> mass murderer is no worse than one who kills only once.

Again, I thank you for pointing out that (white) Americans only killed one, or
killed once.

What a perfect example of your sense of double standards.

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I can
shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"