Raj Feridun wrote:

> I sympathize with the feelings of guilt/shame that sometimes keep
> victims from reporting crimes.

Good.

> At the same time I do not as a result support a system of assumed guilt until
> proven innocence.

Neither do I. Keep reading those six years, or even past week of posts.

> Much more
> importantly than declaring absence of crimes you cannot simply go
> around labelling people as criminals without affording them a chance
> to defend such accusations legally.

Right. People who die or kill themselves before an opportunity for trial are never
criminals, like Hitler, the 9/11 hijackers, or the boys from Columbine.

> >Why not tell us if you have something better than the current system?
>
> I said it's not perfect but I am perfectly happy with the current
> system.

So you are also perfectly happy with those innocents who are punished or even
executed wrongly, or millions a year who do not get justice because law enforcement
never catches up with criminals?

> You're the one with the problem

Your problem is you are unaware of your problem.

> so I think it is beholden upon YOU to offer up alternatives.

I have.