Brett Robson wrote:
> 
> 
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> 
>> Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Ok, so let me get this straight. While one's country is engaged in 
>>>>> an action that is immoral, ignoble, and criminal, this is the 
>>>>> ranking of 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, you claim that Vietnam vets are immoral, ignoble, and criminal?
>>>
>>
>>
>>> I claim nothing of the kind.
>>
>>
>>
>> "While one's country is engaged in an action that is immoral, ignoble,
>> and criminal"
>>
>> I believe those are your words.
>>
>> Did you misquote yourself again?
>>
>> I am certain that a lawyer can figure out that if an action is "immoral,
>> ignoble, and criminal", those carrying out said action must be "immoral,
>> ignoble, and criminal".
>>
> 
> Could one of you Seppos check a Seppoian dictory. I don't think ignoble 
> is the appropriate word, it's not an antonym of noble in this context.
> 
We don't have them anymore. Burned 'em all.

John W.