"Louise Bremner" <dame_zumari@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1gehndv.1k3eozdf1cabeN%dame_zumari@yahoo.com...
> Jason Cormier <fjlij@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/27/04 18:15, in article
> > QLttc.57826$S94.16001@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com, "necoandjeff"
> > <spam@schrepfer.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> That's the only valid reason I can think of for using that naff
> > >> date-stamp "feature" of point-and-shoot cameras. Digital cameras have
> > >> EXIF data, which includes the date and time, but maybe that's too
> > >> high-tech for landlords to comprehend.
> > >>
> > >> Of course, both can be diddled by resetting the date of the camera.
> > >
> > > Yep. Way too easy to fake which means landlords may have a tendency to
> > > laugh. Sealed envelope is a little more compelling. So, that means
there is
> > > ABSOLUTELY NO reason for those stupid date stamps that people like to
> > > plaster all over otherwise perfectly good photographs...
> > >
> >
> >
> > If one is going to all that trouble, why not add the front page of a
couple
> > of that day's national dailies to each shot?
>
> Because you could have saved them from the day you moved in?
>

Oooh very clever, I was with him there until I saw Louise reply, you must
have been watching those gangster movies
where they kidnap people right??
Why not show the photos to the fudosan and get him to verify them with his
inkan, if there is no fudosan involved
then I want your landlords number please. ;)
Any lawyer would do it for you I imagine , or someone from the embassy. But
you would only go to those lengths
if you were the type of victim all these low lifes were after.
Take the photos to Greenwich where I believe there is a world clock and date
and get a photo of a photo of a ......................