Jason Cormier <fjlij@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/27/04 18:15, in article
> QLttc.57826$S94.16001@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com, "necoandjeff"
> <spam@schrepfer.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> >> That's the only valid reason I can think of for using that naff
> >> date-stamp "feature" of point-and-shoot cameras. Digital cameras have
> >> EXIF data, which includes the date and time, but maybe that's too
> >> high-tech for landlords to comprehend.
> >> 
> >> Of course, both can be diddled by resetting the date of the camera.
> > 
> > Yep. Way too easy to fake which means landlords may have a tendency to
> > laugh. Sealed envelope is a little more compelling. So, that means there is
> > ABSOLUTELY NO reason for those stupid date stamps that people like to
> > plaster all over otherwise perfectly good photographs...
> > 
> 
> 
> If one is going to all that trouble, why not add the front page of a couple
> of that day's national dailies to each shot?

Because you could have saved them from the day you moved in?

________________________________________________________________________
                   Louise Bremner (log at gol dot com)
   If you want a reply by e-mail, don't write to my Yahoo address!