"shuji matsuda" <shuji__matsuda@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:br79ar$49ci$1@ID-37799.news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <br4sdq$tti$1@news-est.ocn.ad.jp>,
> v（^-^）v〜♪♭ <whiteboard21@carrot.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

>   "good or wrong" is better than "right or wrong"
>
> と言っておきながら、次は
>
>    "right or bad" と"good or wrong"
>
> の話をbecauseで結ぶ所。論理が一貫できないのでしょうか？
>
> :                  IT'S A SENSE !
>
> なるほどねえ。



Yes !

          " IT'S  A  SENSE ! "

Your NARROW SENSE consists in where you think or consider with the EXTERNAL
GIVEN MEANING(in Japanese) and but with the INTERNAL FROM-THE-FIRST
MEANING(in nature). Shortly this is the proof you lack ability to think or
consider.  And shamelessly the SILLY AND STUPID THINS are told by you.

I'm afraid the following confession by me is too late by now. The fact is
that "right to wrong and good to bad " are known to everybody already at
least as a word or in "Japanese JYUKEN" but actually it never is and I cast
my FISHING LINE with THE BITE and as expected you pull THE LINE and eat IT
with a triumphant air.

Ultimately your too many words are never advisable for me this time as long
as you can't answer the third of my following question mach with your
claiming to others:

          " What is the purpose of talking about GOOD OR WRONG English ? "

I would say many and many times that no one can precisely tell "bad " or "
right" to others negatively but affirmatively.  More I say "to make
ourselves understood somehow or other in English" is important and except
for which anything will do ! "

          " YOU  ARE  SILLY AND STUPID STILL MORE  HARMFUL ! "

--
v(^-^)v~pupu !