In news:awmKb.284505$Ec1.9774004@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net,
Madra Dubh <ccaine@worldnet.att.net> radiated into the WorldWideWait:
> "Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:83jgvvoa9vg569t1f8c3hgnu4rnfutkdln@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:37:39 GMT, "Madra Dubh"
>> <ccaine@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>> "Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:p2gevv0f69f4nm1jillr51neqm34ss4ulq@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 21:12:49 GMT, russj41@concentric.net
>>>> (MacHamish) wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:02:45 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"

>>>>>> PS - did you know it is illegal for a woman in Texas to own
>>>>>> more than five vibrators for example?
>>>>>> What's all that about?
>>>>>
>>>>> It has to do with the legal and proper disposal of batteries.
>>>>> The city dumps down there in Texas were filling up with the
>>>>> damn things, and they were leaking noxious chemicals into the
>>>>> water table.  Next question.
>>>>
>>>> Okey doke.
>>>> Why couldn't they have 10 vibrators and one battery?
>>>
>>> Because only one of the ten would work at any one time.
>>> And to answer your next question, there are many more pleasure
>>> points than one.
>>
>> ah-HA! So they could have ten vibrators and 5 batteries!
>
> Possible, yes, but the ideal would be to have ten vibrators, ten
> batteries, and an octopus.
> (Yes, I know, the octopus only has eight arms)

Besides, isn't his, er, that is, doesn't one of the tentacles, er...
um. Nevermind. <blush>