"Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
news:83jgvvoa9vg569t1f8c3hgnu4rnfutkdln@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:37:39 GMT, "Madra Dubh"
> <ccaine@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:p2gevv0f69f4nm1jillr51neqm34ss4ulq@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 21:12:49 GMT, russj41@concentric.net (MacHamish)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:02:45 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
> >> >>PS - did you know it is illegal for a woman in Texas to own more than
> >five
> >> >>vibrators for example?
> >> >>What's all that about?
> >> >
> >> >It has to do with the legal and proper disposal of batteries.  The
city
> >> >dumps down there in Texas were filling up with the damn things, and
they
> >> >were leaking noxious chemicals into the water table.  Next question.
> >>
> >> Okey doke.
> >>
> >> Why couldn't they have 10 vibrators and one battery?
> >
> >Because only one of the ten would work at any one time.
> > And to answer your next question, there are many more pleasure points
than
> >one.
> >
>
> ah-HA! So they could have ten vibrators and 5 batteries!

Possible, yes, but the ideal would be to have ten vibrators, ten batteries,
and an octopus.
(Yes, I know, the octopus only has eight arms)