"Duke of URL" <macbenahATkdsiDOTnet> wrote in message
news:vvk0kme8d369f5@corp.supernews.com...
> In news:awmKb.284505$Ec1.9774004@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net,
> Madra Dubh <ccaine@worldnet.att.net> radiated into the WorldWideWait:
> > "Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:83jgvvoa9vg569t1f8c3hgnu4rnfutkdln@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:37:39 GMT, "Madra Dubh"
> >> <ccaine@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >>> "Alan Hardie" <axhardie@clara.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>> news:p2gevv0f69f4nm1jillr51neqm34ss4ulq@4ax.com...
> >>>> On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 21:12:49 GMT, russj41@concentric.net
> >>>> (MacHamish) wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:02:45 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
>
> >>>>>> PS - did you know it is illegal for a woman in Texas to own
> >>>>>> more than five vibrators for example?
> >>>>>> What's all that about?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It has to do with the legal and proper disposal of batteries.
> >>>>> The city dumps down there in Texas were filling up with the
> >>>>> damn things, and they were leaking noxious chemicals into the
> >>>>> water table.  Next question.
> >>>>
> >>>> Okey doke.
> >>>> Why couldn't they have 10 vibrators and one battery?
> >>>
> >>> Because only one of the ten would work at any one time.
> >>> And to answer your next question, there are many more pleasure
> >>> points than one.
> >>
> >> ah-HA! So they could have ten vibrators and 5 batteries!
> >
> > Possible, yes, but the ideal would be to have ten vibrators, ten
> > batteries, and an octopus.
> > (Yes, I know, the octopus only has eight arms)
>
> Besides, isn't his, er, that is, doesn't one of the tentacles, er...
> um. Nevermind. <blush>
>
Detachable, I do believe.