"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
news:3ffacd51$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
>
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.THIS.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:JfyKb.769$BA6.217900@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> news:3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> > >
> > > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
> > > > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> > > > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
> > > > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [snip
> > > > > >
> > > > > > . This theorem is
> > > > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then you are a crackpot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
> > > >
> > > > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
> > >
> > > Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
> > > Newton's equations.
> > > Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
> > > Maxwell.
> >
> > Yes, so?
>
> The above logic labels such scientists as crackpots.
> If I disagree with some of Sergey's theories - in fact I do - it is
because
> of theoretical flaws and/or obvious incompatibility with existing
> experimental results. Not because he has his own theory, for that would be
> unscientific of me.

Okay.  I just couldn't see that this was your point when you
implied that Einstein's equations and Maxwell's were
incompatible, largely because they are not.