"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.THIS.netcom.ca> wrote in message
news:JfyKb.769$BA6.217900@news20.bellglobal.com...
> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
news:3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> >
> > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> > news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
> > > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> > > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> > > >
> > > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> > > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > [snip
> > > > >
> > > > > . This theorem is
> > > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you are a crackpot.
> > > >
> > > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
> > >
> > > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
> >
> > Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
> > Newton's equations.
> > Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
> > Maxwell.
>
> Yes, so?

The above logic labels such scientists as crackpots.
If I disagree with some of Sergey's theories - in fact I do - it is because
of theoretical flaws and/or obvious incompatibility with existing
experimental results. Not because he has his own theory, for that would be
unscientific of me.

Harald