"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message news:3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
>
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
> > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> > >
> > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
> > > >
> > > > [snip
> > > >
> > > > . This theorem is
> > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
> > > >
> > > > Then you are a crackpot.
> > >
> > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
> >
> > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
>
> Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
> Newton's equations.
> Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
> Maxwell.

Yes, so?