Re: Alternatives to the iPod?
On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:08:54 +0900, B Robson <luvrethecat@hinet.com>
brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>
>
>Michael Cash wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 23:09:47 +0900, B Robson
>> <greg-the-stop-sign@tism.com.au> brought down from the Mount tablets
>> inscribed:
>>
>>
>>>Michael Cash wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 26 May 2005 17:35:03 +0900, B Robson <luvrethecat@hinet.com>
>>>>brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>For those of you with a cloth ear there are specific measurements of
>>>>>sound quality, frequency response curves, dynamic response, and signal
>>>>>to noise ratio being the most obvious. Good luck finding these on the
>>>>>iPod site. Of course most iPod users use mp3 128K and so can't hear the
>>>>>difference anyway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I spend most of my days happily listening at 32k.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Your sound booth leaves a lot to be desired.
>>
>>
>> True, true. I'm still missing lots of episodes of The Lone Ranger.
>>
>>
>
>BTW I use WAV files or OGG at 512k depending on the music. Morphine
>requires pure WAV files.
Oh, were we talking about music? 128k does me just fine for that.
Sometimes I come into possession of stand-up comedy routines that for
some strange reason have been encoded at double that or above. I
generally batch process them through dBpowerAMP down to a more
reasonable 64k.
--
Michael Cash
"Clowns to the left of me and jokers to the right, Mr. Cash.
Clowns and jokers."
Prof. Ernest T. Bass
Mount Pilot College
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735