"USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in message
news:_TFIa.1195$0%.697@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...

> I am saying that there are less than 3 Japanese posters in these 2 NGs
> regardless
> of whether they post racist crap or not.

I see.

Well, if there are 3 japanese posters, and 2 are "racist"...then that makes
66%. In contrast in soc.culture.korean, there are maybe 15 regular posters
(myself included), and there are maybe 5 that are "racist".

Which proportion is bigger, einstein, 66% or 33%?

> I think everyone would agree that Supertech, Y.Park, Leo Lee are constant
> repeat offenders of posting racist garbage or using racist terms in their
posts.
> Don't you agree?

To Japanese? Or in general?

> > > But more harbor racist feelings, but don't writinmg about it.
> No this is not an assumption.
> Even Koreans would probably agree that this is the case.
> I believe you are denying it for the sake of argument.

No I am not. You are just pulling this out of your ass "for the sake of
argument".

And you are using an overly broad definition of "racism" when it suits your
agenda...

Austin