dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
> Sergey Karavashkin: 
>  >
>  >No smokescreen. I have presented just the proof.
> 
>   Then write down the scalar function \Phi for which you assert
> the relation, \nabla x (\nabla\Phi) = 0 does not hold. Don't
> give me a bunch of interpretational mumbo-jumbo, just write
> the scalar function.
> 
>  >Determine the circulation of vector in my diagram and after this state
>  >curl(grad(phi)) = 0 identically.
> 
>   Write down the function \phi. I'm not going to sort through whatever
> contortions you've gone through to get the wrong answer the hard way.
> Just give me the function.
>  
>  >Still I see the smokescreen from your
>  >side, but the wing is from mine - this is why you are suffocating with
>  >your own smokescreen. Until you understand it, this will irritate your
>  >eyes. Your, not mine. ;-)
>  
>   Write down the scalar function. Don't add any of your personal
> interpretations or try to ``explain'' how I have to calculate
> something to get your answer. Just give me a scalar function.
> I can take a gradient and curl.

First, this what interests you will be in our next paper which we will
publish soon. Second, with such interest to Andrew and his attempts to
join non-joinable, this question is seemingly to him. Third, it is
strange for me to respond to a person who in the neighbouring post
addmits all what I'm saying, but in the posts to me denies everything
what I'm saying.

Sergey