Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
Sergey Karavashkin:
>"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>> If you think I am going to read any of all your recommended URL's, you are
>> gravely mistaken.
>> If you cannot understand that
>> curl(grad(phi)) = 0, {Where phi is any scalar function of position)
>> is a universal truth, then nothing more which you might have to say is
>> useful except except to poke fun at.
>>
>> Franz
>
>Pity you, Franz. You can think whatever, but if you don't see, where
>to the gradient of potential in my animation is directed, it is really
>useless for you to read all the rest. Spend your time among mushrooms.
>;-)
Only a complete nutcase would claim that he discovered a violation
of a mathematical identity.
\nabla x (\nabla\Phi) = e_ijk \nabla_i\nabla_j\Phi
= \nabla_i\nabla_j\Phi - \nabla_j\nabla_i\Phi
= (\nabla_i\nabla_j - \nabla_j\nabla_i)\Phi
= 0
Tell me. What's next on the selflab agenda? Do you plan to show that
sin^2 + cos^2 != 1 for "dynamic fields"?
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735