On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:43:31 +0900, Michael Cash
<mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:

>>Clinton may have perjured himself when he was brought up on charges of
>>having sexual relations with a white house intern. Some of those
>>leading the charge were equally guilty of such infidelities themselves
>>(Mr. Barr).

>He was charged with having sexual relations with a White House intern?
>When was this?

He screwed himself while attempting to wriggle out of his sex scandal.
My personal opinion is that he should not have been put into a
defensive position to begin with. His sex life is HIS business noone
else's.

Raj

>I also deeply regret that Clinton did what he did.

>(But the fact remains that the man *was* impeached, and that the
>Senate acquittal does not remove the impeachment).

No, it doesn't erase the house impeachment but in order for an
impeachment to reach the punishment stage it needs to be voted for in
a 2/3 majority in the Senate as well. Do you think the Senate's
acquittal on those charges has NO bearing on the House Impeachment at
all? There's a reason it goes to the Senate after the House.

Raj