On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 21:28:22 +0900, Raj Feridun
<rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> brought down from the Mount tablets
inscribed:

>On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:51:01 +0900, Michael Cash
><mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:
>
>>>See my response to Gowen. Clinton was acquitted as if you didn't know.
>
>>Clinton was impeached. But not for adultery.
>
>>I know that Clinton was acquitted. You do know that he was impeached,
>>don't you? Or do you think the acquittal wipes out the impeachment?
>
>I think you're reaching/wriggling now, Mike. Clinton was impeached on
>grounds of perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of power. Yes,
>the House of Representatives impeached him but he WAS acquitted in the
>same impeachment proceedings in the Senate impeachment hearings. We
>are not talking about separate cases.

"...some of Clinton's most vicious proponents for impeachment from the
Republican Party were adulterous a-holes like the loudmouth, Bob Barr
of Georgia. That hypocrisy is what sickens me the most about the
Republicans."

Which can leave one with the impression that you thought Clinton was
impeached for adultery. And your current post makes it appear as
though you do indeed think that the Senate acquittal wipes out the
impeachment itself. (See Article I, Section 2, Clause 5).

And if he was *not* impeached on grounds of adultery, then the
adultery of those who impeached him, while morally reprehensible,
doesn't constitute hypocrisy.





--

Michael Cash

"I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of
a high school transcript."

                                Dr. Howard Sprague
                                Dean of Admissions
                                Mount Pilot College