<grunt100@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5ba2f89c.0306251711.38e6a3c6@posting.google.com...
> "USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<Y6jKa.3580$ZI2.632@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>...
> > <grunt100@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:5ba2f89c.0306242026.313f4030@posting.google.com...
> > >
> > > Make your case or shut up.
> > >
> >
> > > It all suited the United States.  So, what is your point?
> >
> > YOU SAID:
> >
> At point, I have written:
> > And it suited Japan
> > fine.  It didn't have to account for its past, and now that it suits
> > to start seemingly expansionist military, it's fine to as long as it
> > suits to Japan.
>
> Is this what you call anti-Japanese racism, or is this what you call
> anti-Japanese attitude?  Make your case.
>
> It is a simple fact that Japan didn't account for its past.  For example,
> what did Japan do about semi-slavery forced laborers who toiled under
> Japan?  In constrast to Germany, Japan didn't do a thing about it.  Again,
> the fact is that Japan didn't fully account for its past.
>
> Then, I am talking about certain facts about Japan's past wrongs.  Is this
> anti-Japanese racism or is this anti-Japanese attitude?  Make your case.
>
> > There's your point you idiot.
> > Case made, now get lost you idiot.
>
> First, you didn't make no case whatsoever.  You don't even define what is
> an anti-Japanese racism, or an anti-Japanese attitude.  I am talking about
> facts.  Categorize the facts (Japan's past wrongs that Japan didn't
account
> fully to this day) I am talking about.
>
Japan not accounting for past actions is one thing, but to start talking
about
Japan "suiting itself" when they were iun noi such position to do so
is patently ridiculous ot tained by a anti-japanese racist bias.

> Second, you have used words like moron against me in other thread without
> any justification whatsoever.  Here, you call me an idiot.  For what
reason?
> If you don't have better things to write, just be gone.  Soc.culture.korea
n
> has seen trolls in the past and it doesn't need another one now.

I called you an idiot because you could not see that I criticized you for
saying "suited Japan"
then gave you reasons why it actually "suited the US" and your only response
to that
was  "It all suited the United States.  So, what is your point?".
That is idiotic.