mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>
> >> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> >> > Raj Feridun wrote:
> >>
> >> > Then act like you understand it, without the assumption that the absence of a
> >> > complaint means the absence of a crime,
> >>
> >> So, despite the fact that we haven't actually heard of criminal charges
> >> filed against you, we should not treat you as if you are not a criminal,
> >> yes?
>
> > As a matter of fact, I have clean criminal and driving records in two countries,
>
> Which isn't the question, now, is it?

People can and already do, treat me as they want, as a criminal or otherwise. Do so
if you wish. You can see it online, for one, and I have met NG posters in person for
precisely that purpose. You can see it at work and in my employment opportunities
when I reveal of my own accord I have committed crime, or when I tell people I know
what I have done.

If you mean you or anyone would like to meet me for some vigilante justice (because
even going to the law myself for what I have done has had zero result) or to report
me to local law enforcement (a claimant other than myself is claimed to be necessary,
even for what I have done, and the clock is ticking), ask me for how to find me or
them. Unlike other criminals, I do not demand a right to remain silent or be free
from search, for example, in an effort to avoid detection or punishment.

One caveat about that vigilante justice: it doesn't improve the effectiveness of
professional law enforcement one bit. It is simply further proof that people could
not live with how impotent the law is.

If you are expecting me to withdraw in shame or whine about any of my so called
rights or allegedly being treated unfairly just because someone points the finger at
me to live under my own standards or to imagine the consequences of living in the
dreaded "EricWorld" myself (probable death), you aren't going to get it.