Michael Cash wrote:

> >I think what Eric's saying is he promotes a system of guilty until
> >proven innocent.
>
> Welcome to the group, Raj. If you've figured that out, you're almost
> caught up with the rest of us now.

And that conclusion would still be mistaken. Even a review of 2001 posts show I do not
promote guilty until proven innocent, but guilty because they did it, or innocent
because they did not do it.