Greetings, I would like you to tall take the preconceived societal
notions in your head about what you think the world is and ponder if
the ter "geek" is merely a disparaging term invented by feminists.




Firstly, a geek would more or less be defined as an intellectual person
who enjoys neither fighting nor fucking.  Unfortunately, men by their
biological definition enjoy at least 2 of three, therefore it is a
logical contradiction for there be a male geek, although there might be
some extremely rare exceptions.  Also, intelligence is actually a
virtue, and the only people who would deny that are feminists.



Secondly, there is the standpoint that societal introversion is the
lowest and more pathetic form of weakness.  ACtually, back in the days
of american prosperity things like hunger disease irresponsibility were
considered bigger threats.   In short, in a world that is not always
kind these supposed "vices" are practically trivial.  Only the feminine
mind could not comprehed this, and probably why the term "geek" is the
quint-essential post 50's epithet.



Last, and not least is the fact that intelligence is not a feminine
strong point, and this is shown easily by the lack of female succes as
inventors/scientists artists businessmen etc.  this cannot be
attributed to discrimation for event jewish and mexican americans, and
even african americans  (the males naturally) have shown far more
aptitude in these areas.  FEminists out of jealous appear to contrive
the propaganda that "intelligence" or its code-epithet "geekiness" is
somehow a weakness.




In short america has now seen a vast decline in education due to the
juvenile jealousies of feminists and their of-repeated epithets.  I
hope this answers your questions