TXZZ wrote:
> 
> Greetings, I would like you to tall take the preconceived societal
> notions in your head about what you think the world is and ponder if
> the ter "geek" is merely a disparaging term invented by feminists.
> 
> Firstly, a geek would more or less be defined as an intellectual person
> who enjoys neither fighting nor fucking.  Unfortunately, men by their
> biological definition enjoy at least 2 of three, therefore it is a
> logical contradiction for there be a male geek, although there might be
> some extremely rare exceptions.  Also, intelligence is actually a
> virtue, and the only people who would deny that are feminists.
> 
> Secondly, there is the standpoint that societal introversion is the
> lowest and more pathetic form of weakness.  ACtually, back in the days
> of american prosperity things like hunger disease irresponsibility were
> considered bigger threats.   In short, in a world that is not always
> kind these supposed "vices" are practically trivial.  Only the feminine
> mind could not comprehed this, and probably why the term "geek" is the
> quint-essential post 50's epithet.
> 
> Last, and not least is the fact that intelligence is not a feminine
> strong point, and this is shown easily by the lack of female succes as
> inventors/scientists artists businessmen etc.  this cannot be
> attributed to discrimation for event jewish and mexican americans, and
> even african americans  (the males naturally) have shown far more
> aptitude in these areas.  FEminists out of jealous appear to contrive
> the propaganda that "intelligence" or its code-epithet "geekiness" is
> somehow a weakness.
> 
> In short america has now seen a vast decline in education due to the
> juvenile jealousies of feminists and their of-repeated epithets.  I
> hope this answers your questions

There may be some truth to this. But...

IMO a geek is just someone who doesn't subscribe to the lemming-like
definition of popular entertainment and what is "cool". They're people
who have their own interests. In being uninterested in popular culture
they are seen as "uncool". But they're actually more interesting people
who are more capable of just being themselves.

Btw, I think males are more likely to be geeks than females. This is
simply because males are more individualistic than females by nature.
Which agrees with what I'm saying as well as what you're saying.