On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:17:20 +0900, Ernest Schaal
<eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:

>I thought you agreed to disagree. If you do not apology for breaking the
>truce you proposed, I will respond.

>It is extremely dishonest and hypocritical of you to expect me to continue
>simply agreeing to disagree when you post the nonsense above. You can't have
>it both ways.

>By the way, I noticed that this message of yours occurred over an hour and a
>half after you thanked me for agreeing to disagree.

Oh, OK, I see how it works. Agreeing to disagree means YOU can
continue to banter on and opine ad infinitum and I can sit there and
be quiet, right?

I don't think so.

Do as you say you will in this group, Ernest. You've got a shoddy
track record in that regard.

Raj

Instead of calling my post "nonsense" why don't you just invoke your
rights under the 5th Amendment? You are American, right?