in article cvvud0lv4n06aaag4139si3nv2bqju7dr5@4ax.com, Raj Feridun at
rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp wrote on 6/28/04 11:21 AM:

> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:17:52 -0500, "John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> One does not go to Moore for "Truth," one goes to him for
>>> entertainment.
> 
>> I'd say there's a good bit of truth to what he says. But sometimes only
>> a small piece of it, with a lot of explanatory information conveniently
>> left out.
> 
> The Moore-haters don't refute the so-called lies with facts. They
> instead attack Moore personally.

It is not an "attack" to say that Moore is what he readily admits to be.

> See the film for yourself. Believe it or not and if you're going to
> come out publically and call Moore a liar actually have some facts to
> back that up. They would speak way louder than the name-calling.
> 
> Raj

No one is calling him a "liar." We are simply saying that he is presenting
propaganda, although entertaining propaganda.