in article BD07866F.1D91E%eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp, Ernest Schaal at
eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp wrote on 6/29/04 8:49 PM:

> in article imh2e0hlvuvl364ib4c9s524s12385elpe@4ax.com, Raj Feridun at
> rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp wrote on 6/29/04 7:59 PM:
>> All the rest, the devout stuff, etc is just a watered down version of
>> what this Mike character is up to. He's just not as sophisticated or
>> polite in his personal attacks as you.
> 
> The point I was trying to make was that you really weren't as bad Jacobs and
> other jerks on the internet who had an evil streak, but then maybe I was
> wrong.

Actually, I was don't think you are as bad as the Jacobs character, who I
don't think is as bad as the Kaz character. Both Jacobs and Kaz are more
self-centered than you appear to be, and Kaz is much more flacky and racist
than Jacobs.

I had responded to Mike because I thought he had gone overboard in his
criticism of you. While I still doubt the honesty your argument and question
your judgment, your comments do seem to be based on strongly held beliefs.
You seem to assume things about other people based upon those beliefs, and
those assumptions made you make unwarranted stereotypes. In the same way,
Mike made unwarranted stereotypes from his beliefs.

I disapproved of you doing it, and I disapprove of him doing it as well. Not
all conservatives love Hitler and not all liberals love Stalin.