Rykk wrote:

> > So is your claim that the US government is a criminal, and less
> > deserving of trust and forgiveness or even protection, which Rykk
> > would give even sex offenders as his neighbors, than millions of
> > actual criminals?
>
> It is interesting the language of that last sentence.  You seem to be
> implying that sex offenders are not actual criminals.

No, I am contrasting the US government which you do not trust, to millions of
actual, legally convicted criminals and increasing by the year, which include
sex offenders (if they are somehow caught and convicted less than three
times) whom you would allow to remain anonymous, and to forgive and trust.

So you agree that a once convicted criminal is a criminal (present tense).
Yet you trust millions of them a year, more than your own government. Very
interesting.

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I
can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"