<mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net> wrote in message 
news:e698sg$bu7$1@news.Stanford.EDU...
> Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
>> in article e68a61$dk9$2@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/8/06 1:48 PM:
>
>> > Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
>> >
>> >> For instance, early on in my message I noted that your statement "at 
>> >> least
>> >> two groups of people who seemingly get more out of the 'disastrous' 
>> >> public
>> >> schools, that sentence is so poorly drafted as to have two vastly 
>> >> different
>> >> meanings."
>> >
>> > Yes, I noticed that. That was the second time I had used such phrasing.
>> >
>> > My apologies for expecting you to have been following along.
>
>> My apologies for expecting you to clarify your message. Instead, I would
>
>> In case you forgot, I asked "By the way, you never said what role you had
>> when you 'sat through a couple of those protests with people in the
>> neighborhood'." What role was it?
>
> One of the neighbors needed someone to help with the appeal process
> because they didn't feel their English was up to the task.
>
> Mike
>
I would like to toss my two cents in here.
I feel that as a general rule public are less than private only because of 
the parents.
Excepting  the case of Lina Sinha