On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:53:03 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
<grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
>news:m63uq0p3a5pr6qmvihugerf2qbfmtabj38@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:25:58 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
>> <grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
>> >news:18ejq0hij0mj06inm3agl4rlcsvtu6eikp@4ax.com...
>> >
>> >> The proof of the pudding will come in a hundred years when the
>> >> history of this affair is written.
>> >
>> >Depends who wins.
>>
>> Very good, Adam, although I wouldn't have thought my point needed any
>> further elucidation.  At least you're showing an improved ability to
>> comprehend the obvious.  There may be a glimmer of hope for you.
>>
>> >A W-S
>> >PS. Simply breathtaking hypocrisy by the way.
>>
>> But apparently you still have a ways to go in terms of understanding more
>> complex ideas.
>
>Dear, oh dear.
>That's pretty pathetic even for a simpleton such as yourself MacH. In any
>case how could you possibly know.
>If I get a break from the insane 'must have it finished by Xmas' fetishism
>of my landscaping clients I might get a chance to sail an oil tanker through
>the ridiculous holes in your rants.
>Some of it is blatently spurious and a good deal of the rest is simply wrong
>information.
>As Mozart said; I'll be bach.

And I'll still be here, waiting to blow your oil tanker out of the water.

MacHamish M$(D??(Br