"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:m63uq0p3a5pr6qmvihugerf2qbfmtabj38@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:25:58 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
> <grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >news:18ejq0hij0mj06inm3agl4rlcsvtu6eikp@4ax.com...
> >
> >> The proof of the pudding will come in a hundred years when the
> >> history of this affair is written.
> >
> >Depends who wins.
>
> Very good, Adam, although I wouldn't have thought my point needed any
> further elucidation.  At least you're showing an improved ability to
> comprehend the obvious.  There may be a glimmer of hope for you.
>
> >A W-S
> >PS. Simply breathtaking hypocrisy by the way.
>
> But apparently you still have a ways to go in terms of understanding more
> complex ideas.

Dear, oh dear.
That's pretty pathetic even for a simpleton such as yourself MacH. In any
case how could you possibly know.
If I get a break from the insane 'must have it finished by Xmas' fetishism
of my landscaping clients I might get a chance to sail an oil tanker through
the ridiculous holes in your rants.
Some of it is blatently spurious and a good deal of the rest is simply wrong
information.
As Mozart said; I'll be bach.
A W-S