etaka <etaka@yahoo.com> wrote:
> mtfes...@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

> etaka <e...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> mtfes...@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >>> You really need to read and understand what you're reading.
> >> I read it. The problem is he is misrepresenting the issue.
> >
> > No, he is addressing a specific issue.
> >
> >> A legal system that convicts zero "innocents" is not a 100% error free
> >> legal system, which should be the envy of industry.
> >
> > Actually, that would be an exemplary system.

> If you're willing to imagine that much, why not a system which actually
> is perfect?

Because until we're dead, we live in a real world, which is bound with
error.

> Then by that standard, here is a system which I predict would be 100%
> "error" free and can be implemented with today's technology, without
> further incursion on individual rights, and would save billions in
> taxpayer dollars: only allow convictions and punishments for crimes in
> the USA, if they occur in the presence of all the Supreme Court
> Justices, they all witness the crime taking place, and they and all

Sorry, but the Supreme Court doesn't try cases.

> per case they win. As in "Minority Report" all those currently
> incarcerated must be immediately freed, because the current corrupt
> system which knowingly punishes innocents is obviously unacceptable.

Sorry, which "innocents" does it punish? Be specific.


> >> The perfect legal system would also need to punish all those who break

> > Sorry, you're reading an article which is different from what was
> > presented. The one I presented addressed wrongful convictions.

> Then I request a different choice of links for my amusement. Today it
> was this:

> http://tinyurl.com/7fldf

> Leaping crocodile slams into car

I'm sure soc.culture.australia would be fascinated.

Mike