etaka <etaka@yahoo.com> wrote:
> mtfes...@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

> > You really need to read and understand what you're reading. I read it.

> I read it. The problem is he is misrepresenting the issue.

No, he is addressing a specific issue.

> A legal system that convicts zero "innocents" is not a 100% error free
> legal system, which should be the envy of industry.

Actually, that would be an exemplary system.

> The perfect legal system would also need to punish all those who break

Sorry, you're reading an article which is different from what was
presented. The one I presented addressed wrongful convictions.

> laws, among other things, such as not trying and stigmatizing
> "innocents" to begin with. His claim of 99.973 percent efficiency
> conveniently ignores this.

Again, you need to UNDERSTAND what you read.

Mike