"Eric Takabayashi" <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote in message 
news:4194B765.353A7EDC@yahoo.co.jp...
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>
>> Please post the relevant laws stating law enforcement officials are NOT
>> allowed to find the truth. Please be very specific.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3f8bv
>
> Amendment IV
>
> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and 
> effects,
> against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no 
> warrants
> shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, 
> and
> particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or 
> things to be
> seized.
>
> Amendment V
>
> No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous 
> crime,
> unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases 
> arising in
> the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in 
> time of war
> or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to 
> be twice
> put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal 
> case to be
> a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, 
> without
> due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, 
> without
> just compensation.

Note the words "probable cause" and "due process."  You are saying that 
"probable cause" and "due process" are too restrictive?

Rykk