Kevin Gowen wrote:

> necoandjeff wrote:
> 
>>Kevin Gowen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Robert La Ferla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Bah. Despite any reported voting problems, there
>>>>>>was a clear winner this time, and Bush had a
>>>>>>majority of voters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Complaining Americans should have voted. Not even
>>>>>>the electoral system was to blame this time.
>>>>>
>>>>>We had a clear cheater this time:
>>>>>http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/timages/page/exit_poll.gif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sampling errors are the reason commentators were wary of exit
>>>>polls. Results of random polls and their margin of error,
>>>>however, were reflected in election results almost perfectly,
>>>>interestingly enough. Dead heat, or only one or two percentage
>>>>points difference, with about a three percent margin of error.
>>>>Bingo. I was not expecting this, because only about half of
>>>>people actually vote.
>>>>
>>>>Bush came out of practically nowhere himself, but Democrats
>>>>needed a better candidate. Dean was more likable than Kerry.
>>>>Gore also should have given it a try.
>>>
>>>The Dem candidate should have been Joe Lieberman, but he was
>>>pro-family, pro-defense, and religious. He never had a chance.
>>
>>
>>Again, demonstration of how out of touch you are. There's no way in hell
>>that a non-religious person, or God forbid an atheist, could be elected in
>>the United States. 
> 
> 
> Yes. That is why the Dems talk about God. The problem is, when Lieberman
> talks about God, we know that he actually believes what he is saying.
> 

And I guess none of them will be in heaven either, especially Lieberman
as he hasn't accepted Jesus.