Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> Robert La Ferla wrote:
> 
> 
>>Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bah. Despite any reported voting problems, there
>>>was a clear winner this time, and Bush had a
>>>majority of voters.
>>>
>>>Complaining Americans should have voted. Not even
>>>the electoral system was to blame this time.
>>
>>We had a clear cheater this time:
>>http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/timages/page/exit_poll.gif
> 
> 
> Sampling errors are the reason commentators were wary of exit
> polls. Results of random polls and their margin of error,
> however, were reflected in election results almost perfectly,
> interestingly enough. Dead heat, or only one or two percentage
> points difference, with about a three percent margin of error.
> Bingo. I was not expecting this, because only about half of
> people actually vote.
> 
> Bush came out of practically nowhere himself, but Democrats
> needed a better candidate. Dean was more likable than Kerry.
> Gore also should have given it a try.

The Dem candidate should have been Joe Lieberman, but he was pro-family,
pro-defense, and religious. He never had a chance.

-- 
Kevin
"This is the best election night in history."--Democratic National
Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, Nov. 2, 2004, just before 8 p.m. EST