Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

>> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:

>> How are you so certain it is YOU who doesn't "get it"?

> Because for example, people like myself are criminals, whether others
> ever know it or not, and after 1987, there is supposedly no way for even
> I to know about my criminal record.

Sorry, this doesn't answer the question; you are adamant that the others
who disagree with you don't "get it". The fact that you may or may not
have a criminal record is irrelevant to that.

> So, how is my own criminal record of one arrest and guilty plea for
> shoplifting any less "metaphysical" than OJ's true criminal status?

Sorry, I never used the word "metaphysical" in this discussion, and
therefore need not respond to that. 

> PS, don't say, you can conduct a background check on me, because
> you allegedly wouldn't find anything. Even my single traffic ticket
> (Hawaii, 1986) is no longer on my driving abstract, which I have seen
> numerous times.

To point out the BLINDINGLY obvious, anyone could simply start by taking
your word on these events to begin their investigations. I'm certain
that they could get information, if they cared.

Still doesn't address how it is that YOU "get it", and the rest of us
don't.


>> After all, you have been spectacularly unsuccessful in getting people to agree with you
>> after repeatedly explaining your position.

> Because they put their trust into a flawed legal system even they can
> recognize as flawed, most without even bothering to think of how it can
> be improved.

No, most everyone here has offered suggestions on to improve it. They
simply feel your suggestions are, at best, hand-waving illusionary
wishful thinking.

Mike