Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
> in article cauqam$qvh$1@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/18/04 10:22 PM:

>>> I did before. Basically, you were (and apparently are) presupposing a
>>> constant tax burden.
>> 
>> Uh, no. I corrected your mistake about "total tax burden" which must, by
>> defintion, equal 100%.

> Mike, clearly you don't understand how the term "total tax burden" is used

http://www.cbpp.org/4-10-02tax.htm

or

http://www.allegromedia.com/sugi/taxes/#Head-3.htm

Both use the term "tax burden" to describe the %age of the Federal Taxes
for each income category, adding up to 100%.

Care to try again?

Mike