Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
> in article capi7q$jvj$3@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/16/04 10:33 PM:

>> Uh, no, my sentence gives the correct impression that if I am asked for
>> "what (I) think tax cuts should be proportionate to", I would be giving
>> an opinion. There is, in fact, an implication, that there may be more
>> than one way to define this.
>> 
>> Sorry, but you're wrong again.

> Your previous comments are ambiguous and you have made absolutely no attempt
> to reduce that ambiguity. 

My comments were clear; you are attempting to get a value judgement from
me. Failing that, you fabricate your own, in order to refute it.

Granted, an argument with you is an easily winnable one, but not that
interesting.

Mike