Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
> in article catdoj$o00$3@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/18/04 9:41 AM:

>> necoandjeff <spam@schrepfer.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't profess to know that much about the Reagan tax cuts (I was in junior
>>> high when Reagan was first elected to office) but I have heard the basic
>>> claims time and time again (claims that are made without any hard data or
>>> thoughtful analysis about 99.9% of the time.) I was hoping for a little
>>> enlightenment, and when Mike continued his evasions of a fairly simple
>>> question, I decided to hop in for one last attempt at getting an answer from
>>> him, apparently to no avail...
>> 
>> If you have been following along as you claim, how did you miss the
>> 
>> http://www.taxfoundation.org/prtopincometable.html
>> 
>> reference?
>> 
>> Odd that your search through my posts didn't catch that reference. Are
>> you unable to read the data?

> I took the bother to check out the reference, but it didn't support your
> argument. Instead, it proved the contrary.

Oh, so the tax cuts were actually proportional to income? To previous
tax rate? 

So how did the tax burden magically slightly off the richest, onto the
lower income brackets?

Mike