Re: Ok, I was wrong about the Supreme Court
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:32:11 +0900, Michael ...
>
>On 26 Jun 2003 19:22:26 -0700, Brett Robson <jet_boy@deja.com> belched
>the alphabet and kept on going with:
>
>>On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:50:10 -0400, "Kevin ...
>>>
>>>For over two year I have told apoplectic leftists that the Supreme Court was
>>>not a conservative body that made a purely political decision in Bush v.
>>>Gore. Now I must stand corrected. On Monday,
>>
>>30 years after the South Australian parliament did the same thing,
>
>The date isn't the important distinction there. It is the branch of
>government.
>
I understand your point but disagree. This is being toted as a liberal move when
in fact most countries have got passed these ridiculous arguments three decades
ago. I read on the weekend that this law was actually passed 30 years ago when
sodomy was legalized for hetrosexuals.
Ignoring the moral or legal grounds this is a massive waste of time, it is
absolutely amazing the the Sumpreme Court had to even considering the legality
of someone buggering his friend in the private. About on par with investigating
whether the president was getting his knob sucked.
---
"he [John Ashcroft] deliberately left Jesus out of office prayers to avoid
offending non-Christians." - Ben Shapiro 27/2/2003
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735