Autymn D. C. wrote:
> jem wrote:
> 
>>:)  I see.  You plan to correct posters for not writing as they think,
>>and you'll determine how they think based on what they write.  Logic's
>>not one of your stong suits, is it?
> 
> 
> It is, and it isn't yours.  "as they think" and "think based on" are
> equivalent to p -> q !=> q -> p.  Scientists calibrate carbon dating by
> tree rings, and calibrate tree rings by dating.  Does that make their
> study a bunch of rubbish?  No, the other dating is the out.
> 
> People are aware of more internal feeling than they can express in
> writing or any other form.  The simpler people are always lost for
> words or signs when they are being complex.  They don't understand
> which marks are used for which breaks, or even that those marks exist
> or matter or are distinct.  Anyway, think about it and go away.

I think it's nonsensical gibbering, and I'll go where I please.