jem wrote:
> :)  I see.  You plan to correct posters for not writing as they think,
> and you'll determine how they think based on what they write.  Logic's
> not one of your stong suits, is it?

It is, and it isn't yours.  "as they think" and "think based on" are
equivalent to p -> q !=> q -> p.  Scientists calibrate carbon dating by
tree rings, and calibrate tree rings by dating.  Does that make their
study a bunch of rubbish?  No, the other dating is the out.

People are aware of more internal feeling than they can express in
writing or any other form.  The simpler people are always lost for
words or signs when they are being complex.  They don't understand
which marks are used for which breaks, or even that those marks exist
or matter or are distinct.  Anyway, think about it and go away.

-Aut