Sergey Karavashkin wrote:

> Russ Lyttle <lyttlec@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:<A_IKb.40467$Pg1.19800@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
>> Harry wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
>> > news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
>> >> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
>> >> news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
>> >> > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > [snip
>> >> > >
>> >> > > . This theorem is
>> >> > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Then you are a crackpot.
>> >> >
>> >> > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
>> >>
>> >> Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
>> > 
>> > Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
>> > Newton's equations.
>> > Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
>> > Maxwell.
>> Not quiet. Einstein *assumes* that Newton was correct and adds a forth
>> assumption : the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of
>> reference. All of the Tensor math Einstein did was to make Newtons Laws
>> hold in all inertial frames of reference.
> 
> Why so, dear colleague? Newton's and Einstein's conceptions are
> philosophically incompatible, and Einstein has made nothing in tensor
> mathematics. 

Einstein assumed Newtons three laws were correct and added a fourth :
"The speed of light is constant in all frames of reference.
What he didn't like was Quantum Theory. Thus his famous comment "God doesn't
play dice with the Universe."
Tensor math is the only way to handle the rubbersheet geometry. Tensor math
was invented to describe stress in metal structures. But in the
pre-computer days it was too complex to handle. I have some books with some
of Einstein's work of tensor. If I can still find them, I'll post
references. Meanwhile,
<http://vishnu.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.html> has a good account
of "The Einstein Tensor" for gravity.

<http://scholar.uwinnipeg.ca/courses/38/4500.6-001/Cosmology/Field-Equations.htm>
gives more equations and some history plus images of the original works. It
doesn't render well on my browser though.

>By his own words, the equation that he derived together
> with Grossmann is some ungrounded paraphrase of Poisson's and Newton's
> equations, as, tinkering this stucco, they never came to something
> better.
> 

> By the way, Einstein claimed Newton incorrect and even lectured it.

"Incomplete", not incorrect. All of Einstein's work reduces to Newton for
relative velocities << C.
> 
> True, this all has no concern to the subject of this thread, but this
> is so. If you want to make sure additionally, I can repeat you some
> questions from which at due time Franz and his colleagues flew from
> threads. ;-)
> 
> Sergey
My head almost exploded when I took Tensor math. After the class, I thought
I could undersatand Einstein. But when I tried to read the papers again, I
had a migrane for two weeks.
-- 
Russ Lyttle
lyttlec(@)earthlink.net