Harry wrote:

> 
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
>> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
>> news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
>> >
>> > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
>> > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
>> > >
>> > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
>> > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
>> > >
>> > > [snip
>> > >
>> > > . This theorem is
>> > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
>> > >
>> > > Then you are a crackpot.
>> >
>> > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
>>
>> Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
> 
> Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
> Newton's equations.
> Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
> Maxwell.
Not quiet. Einstein *assumes* that Newton was correct and adds a forth
assumption : the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of
reference. All of the Tensor math Einstein did was to make Newtons Laws
hold in all inertial frames of reference.
-- 
Russ Lyttle